"Christian Jihad" – once an oxymoron

The first thing I’ll say is that this book was not an easy read.  Secondly, most of my review will be an analysis of various responses that have resulted from this controversial topic.  Emir & Ergun Caner, in my opinion, presented a rather unbiased, objective, historical representation of this dark age.  From the early formations of Augustine’s just war criteria to the Spanish Inquisition, they provide us with a comprehensive yet concise overview of “the Crusades and killing in the name of Christ.”  They highlight the abuses of the Papacy in manipulating the masses, taking advantage of their ignorance, and promising salvation to all worthy crusading participants.  Many of the accounts in this book are nauseating, at times causing you to tell yourself that “ignorance really is bliss.” 

The Crusades were tragic.  They attest to the depths of our self-deception, greed, lust for power, and utter depravity.  Moreover, they bear witness of the black shrouds of darkness present in the chambers of an unregenerate  human heart (notice the emphasis on unregenerate).  So we can ask:  Were the majority of the participants in these events authentic Christians who were regenerated by the power of the Holy Spirit?  Whatever the case, a close examination (heck, even a brief perusal) of Scripture unequivocally demonstrates that Christ does not advocate the type of atrocities committed during this terrible epoch of church history.

Augustine of Hippo once said, “Never judge a philosophy by its abuse.”  But is it not human nature to judge the validity of a philosophy by the practice (or malpractice thereof) of that philosophy’s adherents?  ”Judge not, lest you be judged” has transformed into the obstinate fight song of our generation.  It’s as if those words grant us a license to live in moral degradation, rejecting any authority over us that demands higher ethical submission.  The fallacy present in choking out a particular religion because of its hypocritical following has become dominant in our postmodern world.  This ideology has pointedly honed in on and attacked the Christian faith, deeming this faith inadequate become of its abuse.  

However, the logical conclusion is apparent:  We do not judge a philosophy by its abuse, but by its truth.  And who do we follow but the very One who is the ultimate Truth? The One who looked at the masses and was moved with compassion.  The One to whom every knee will one day bow and every tongue one day confess.  You see, the One who wielded the very sword Pope Boniface claimed belonged to the papacy is the One who emptied Himself, becoming the slain Lamb who died for and redeemed those who hated Him.  Proposing to reject the Christian religion because of its history fails to carefully examine the validity of that  religion’s one true God. Yet we cannot help but wonder if there is a deeper underlying motivation to this adamant objection.  A rejection of true Christianity is a rejection of Christ.  Our Creator is not polluted by the sins of mankind, nor by the sins of Christ “professors.”

In the end, the glory of God will not be clouded by the depravity of man.


Comments

  1. Josh Mensinger says:

    Absolutely awesome qoute from Augustine to thrown in their to explain the Crusades! Wish I would have thought of it

  2. Kevin S says:

    I like the quote, too. I am unfamiliar with it. Can you provide a source?

  3. Steven Benjamin says:

    nice ending quote
    im a fan of nice ending quotes

Speak Your Mind

*

Bad Behavior has blocked 52 access attempts in the last 7 days.