<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>(south)WESTERN CIVILIZATION&#187; Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.southwesterncivilization.com/tag/philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.southwesterncivilization.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 03:49:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Thomas Aquinas: The Brilliant Dumb Ox</title>
		<link>http://www.southwesterncivilization.com/thomas-aquinas-the-brilliant-dumb-ox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.southwesterncivilization.com/thomas-aquinas-the-brilliant-dumb-ox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summa Theologica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Aquinas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southwesterncivilization.wordpress.com/2008/01/27/thomas-aquinas-the-brilliant-dumb-ox/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Severe repercussions for all those tempted to &#8220;compliment&#8221; me by referring to the similarities between me and Thomas Aquinas. Here is a short introduction from Christian History magazine. Thomas AquinasThe brilliant &#8220;dumb ox&#8221; &#8220;In order that men might have knowledge of God, free of doubt and uncertainty, it was necessary for divine truth to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Severe repercussions for all those tempted to &#8220;compliment&#8221; me by referring to the similarities between me and Thomas Aquinas.  Here is a short introduction from <span style="font-style:italic;">Christian History</span> magazine.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:130%;"></span><br />
<blockquote><span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:130%;">Thomas Aquinas</span><br />The brilliant &#8220;dumb ox&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;In order that men might have knowledge of God, free of doubt and uncertainty, it was necessary for divine truth to be delivered to them by way of faith, being told to them as it were, by God himself who cannot lie.&#8221;</p>
<p>No one claimed Thomas Aquinas got famous on his looks. He was colossally fat, suffered from edema (dropsy), and one huge eye dwarfed his other. Nor was he a particularly dynamic, charismatic figure. Introspective and silent most of the time, when he did speak, it was often completely unrelated to the conversation. His classmates in college called him &#8220;the dumb ox.&#8221; Today, recognized as the greatest theologian of the Middle Ages, he is called &#8220;the doctor of angels.&#8221;  (<a href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/history/special/131christians/aquinas.html">Click here to read more&#8230;</a>)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.southwesterncivilization.com/thomas-aquinas-the-brilliant-dumb-ox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

